Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ruswick 4895 days ago
1) It's referred to as "satire." It's fairly conspicuous considering that I left out a description of the actual product, placing emphasis only on the age. It was an attempt to demonstrate the absurdity of this practice.

2)The app is a fine app. I don't believe that it is comparable to Fruit Ninja, but still a fine app. Why does this make me either a hypocrite or a troll? How is the quality of his app pertinent to my actions at all?

3) This is an entirely unfounded ad hominem attack. If you really believe this, then I give up. I can't argue against people who dismiss me because they think I'm envious. I think my points are of merit and pertinent to the conversation. This is supported by the healthy number of up-votes it has. If you want to dismiss it as "bitterness," I can't stop you and I don't really care.

4) I'm not comparing ages, I'm comparing stages of learning programming. Whether he's 14 or 40, he has only recently begun programming. A beginner at 40 will face similar challenges. Learning a new skill is difficult for anyone of any age. Your logic is either a) circular and incoherent inasmuch as it is predicated on having prior knowledge about programming when one is first learning programming, or b) not applicable because it deals with a factor that, as I've already said in my above post, is irrelevant.

5) The pricing comment did not pertain in any way to his app. It was directed at the "support independent developers" argument to which I drew parallels from his practice. I am aware that the app is free. If you actually read my comment and considered it, you would notice that it's not directed at the kid.

5) What dictates that I can only provide criticism about the app itself? It is totally within the realm of reason that I critique his marketing practices, etc. Why does the fact that I criticized his use of the age belie my "belief in what I'm writing?" Why is this a rant? It was a pretty well-structured argument touching on what is considered a contentious practice.

6) No, you are making an (unwarranted and incoherent) big deal about the fact that I did. I think his app is fine. I wouldn't use it, though.

1 comments

With such a long response, one would expect there would be something said about the damning part of his post:

"For the record, why would you post http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4807691 titled "Show HN: I'm 16, and I made a thing" if you are so irked by people using their age on hacker news?"

vs

"For the record, I am of a similar age and always refrain from giving my age."