|
|
|
|
|
by pacaro
4892 days ago
|
|
This caught my eye "Program analyzers that warn about these problems are likely to lose users." For me, this is perhaps the biggest issue raised in this article, as static and dynamic analysis tools become more ubiquitous we should be learning to fix the issues that they raise, not ignore them. I remember a while ago (2004 or 5) interviewing a college-hire candidate, I had asked about working with others and we had gotten to talking about code review - the candidate was passionate about how code review had helped with a group project he worked on, but every single example he gave of a a bug found by code review was something that -Wall would have found... The same applies to static analysis - let the machines do the work that they can do, that leaves the humans to get on with the work that the machines can't do (yet!) |
|