|
|
|
|
|
by jmix
4894 days ago
|
|
Imagine two nodes, both initiating updates to the same row. One has observed a number of node additions and deletions. The other has not. They will perform their updates on disjoint sets. > There's not really any way that nodes can disagree on this. Atomic, dynamic updates to a ring are a difficult thing to do. If I'm missing some additional mechanism that ensures agreement on ring membership, please explain. |
|