|
|
|
|
|
by BitMastro
4897 days ago
|
|
I understand what you mean, but I'm saying that compromising the sandbox can be looked as well as an additional step to achieve.
And more so if, for example, address space randomization is offered by the OS. In this case the security model is reinforced, rather than weakened. |
|
You're making no sense. The previous attack vectors don't go away when you put your keys into Chrome. Chrome becomes an additional option for the attacker, not an additional "step".
A house with two doors is less secure than the same house with one door.