|
|
|
|
|
by dpryan
4894 days ago
|
|
Exactly. Hardware needs pre-funding more than anything. The article is opening up a discussion for alternative models that work better than Kickstarter. The problem with Kickstarter's approach is that oftentimes, the reality of the product is divorced from the perception of the product. There are countless examples of high profile hardware products that failed to deliver on expectations. That hurts the Kickstarter brand. Kickstarter can't be expected to guarantee projects. It's too costly. And it opens them up to liability. I'm not suggesting that self-starter is the final version of this model. It's an evolutionary process - and an opportunity for a new startup with a different approach. |
|
If you can demonstrate demand, funding will become a second order problem.