Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by guard-of-terra 4897 days ago
Creationism has no relation to science so it should not be on science class.
2 comments

Exactly, save creationism for a world religions class and evolution for the science class. They cannot be compared in the context of science because creationism is outside of the scientific process.

This popular image says it all: http://punchkids.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/science_vs_f...

True, but try to tell that to the millions of people who believe creationism IS science... To make it simple, just let the kids choose and decide for themselves...
> To make it simple, just let the kids choose and decide for themselves...

No, that's not how it works. By that logic we also would have to teach about ghosts, dwarfs, <stroke>astronomy</stroke>astrology, or just claims made by other religions or folklore. There's a reason we teach our children sciences. They are objective, observable, testable, falsifiable, etc. We want a rational society, not despotism.

You meant astrology.
Yep, thanks!
I'm trying amn't I.

It is not science and it's not a question of beliefs.

You should not lie to kids. By telling them about creation in science classes, you lie to them.

The millions of people who believe creationism IS science are wrong. It's imperative for people to let them know (politely, of course) that they are wrong, especially in the science classroom
yes, but how can the kids choose when the information will inevitably be provided in a completely biased manner?
Uh, no? Why bother sending them to school then? This is not about beliefs, it is about science.