|
|
|
|
|
by jws
4903 days ago
|
|
Tempting, but no IPv6. That's a deal breaker for infrastructure. I don't want to have to revisit machines later. I'm also a little nervous about the unlimited bandwidth. That seems like it will attract bulk data movers that could affect my traffic. There is no mention of fairness, link utilization, or any kind of traffic allocation policy. I could benchmark it today, but that doesn't help me tomorrow. Still, interesting enough to add to the list of options with the next project. |
|
As for unlimited bandwidth that is something we offered because we didn't have time to write bandwidth accounting and wanted to focus development on the core service more, we figured that was more important for us in the short run.
We will be switching to paid bandwidth in the future and offering bundled packages with each server and then a simple flat per GB price after that.