[henrikschroder]

I'm sorry you got downvoted, but you are in a nutshell describing the vast difference in the purpose of the justice system between Northern Europe and the US.

You frame it as a question of headcount and worth and vengeance. And from that standpoint you conclude that the vengeance exacted on Breivik was not enough, given his crimes.

But over here, the purpose of punishments in the justice system is ultimately about protecting society and rehabilitating criminals. Vengeance plays no part. And if he can be a productive member of society again after rehabilitation in prison, that's better than him taking up resources as a prisoner.

[Julianhearn]

If its just about protecting society and rehabilitating why is the recommended sentence longer for murder than for say rape? The simple answer is that murder is seen as a worst crime, so you serve more time. So how can killing 77 not be worst than killing one person? There is more to the justice system than just protecting society and rehabilitation. If breivik was fully rehabilitated and no longer a threat after one year why not let him out?