| Yes. We really only have two options. Removing the convicted criminal completely from society forever - or rehabilitation. We have chosen the latter. The horrible crime Breivik is convicted of is far beyond anything our lawmakers ever took into account, so this is a painful edge case, testing the bounds of our judicial system. Yet, apart from emotional outcries in the days and weeks immediately following the atrocities, changing the system has not been on anyone's agenda. That said - if the authorities consider the rehabilitation to have failed, and the criminal is still dangerous after his sentence is served, they can keep him locked up for another ten years. And another ten years. And another ten years. But that is not punishment. If he after 21 years is considered harmless he will be let out. And we must, reluctantly, accept that this is the price we pay for our low crime rates and low number of repeat offenders. Michael Moore visited one of our minimum security prisons, where criminals may serve the last parts of their sentence. They are being slowly re-integrated into society through useful work and humane living conditions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGTzbj3fRSw Yes, the system actually works. |
I'm not sure simply applying the Norweigan solution would actually work here - there needs to be a more systemic societal change in order for that to work.
Having said that, consider me impressed with your society's level head.