[adrr]

I thought it was surrounding the DMV definition for "Person" from the DMV code and not corporation personhood. The defendant did have a thing against personhood but seems the defense was that signs were legally vague in accordance to the DMVs definition of person.

470. "Person" includes a natural person, firm, copartnership, association, limited liability company, or corporation.

http://dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d01/vc470.htm

[NoPiece]

You are right, but I do think it ties into the larger "corporations are people" thing that has been bothering people since the campaign finance reform law was overturned.