Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by EwanToo 4918 days ago
To me this reads like pretty standard fraud, along the lines of carousel fraud[1] which was very common a few years ago.

If nobody is arrested or punished for it, then that's more like weak enforcement than clever use of the system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_trader_fraud#Carousel_f...

2 comments

> To me this reads like pretty standard fraud

I assume the companies ran this by legal before going forward with the plan. Loopholes aren't illegal, they're just exploits.

However, by all accounts, this one appears to be illegal.

From post below (soon hopefully to be 'above'):

"> (5) Importers shall not generate RINs for renewable fuel that has already been assigned RINs by a registered foreign producer.[2]"

The important bit here is that expiration failure "glitch", and the details thereof. If it's just a straight up glitch and the law called for the expiration of the RINs after one crossing then this is a pretty clear-cut case of fraud. If a bank error puts a million dollars in your account, or if a car falls off a shipping truck into your front yard, that doesn't make it yours. By the same token, a glitch in the expiration system doesn't make exploiting that glitch legal.