[tolmasky]

What is being suggested is that the plaintext may contain a random html tag (Perhaps if supplied by a user, or perhaps because that tag is meant to be displayed as plaintext as well. The reason doesn't rally matter, "tags" in any situation are still valid plaintext). By passing text to something that replaces new lines with br the implication is that it is now safe to drop into HTML -- however now that tag from before can take effect (particularly bad if its a script tag). Thus, this function doesn't make sense unless it is at least also coupled with HTML escaping.

[timdev2]

> By passing text to something that replaces new lines with br the implication is that it is now safe to drop into HTML

I don't see how that's implied at all. After all, the function is named nl2br, not html2text.

[tolmasky]

It's implied because basically the only context under which <br>'s are used is when appearing in HTML. If someone is taking text, converting the newlines to <br>'s, then there's a 99.9% chance that the next step is that that text is going to be placed in a larger HTML document. Unless of course I'm forgetting some alternative use of <br>'s.

I agree the function does exactly what it says it will do. And if this was a private function used by something like text2html internally, then maybe it might be a fine function. However, as a public function, the argument is that it inspires bad programming practices, since again, it is almost certainly being used as a primitive form of "sanitation" or "conversion" before displaying plaintext in a larger HTML document.

I think if you could come up with an example of how this would be used NOT as an immediate precursor to dropping into HTML I could be convinced otherwise (and saying it is used after the other tags go through a sanitation process is a poor response, since it means this function must always follow the other one -- further proving its uselessness as a standalone function).

[tarabukka]

I have never, ever seen nl2br referred to as making anything secure or safe. It just converts new lines to <br />s. That's what the manual says it does. That's what tutorials say it does. That's what the function name very obviously shows.

I think map() from Python should be removed. Its name implies to a new learner that it will draw a map, but it actually does nothing to that effect at all! No, it maps an array to a function. We must rename this dangerous function to call_a_function_on_every_element_of_an_array - or, even better, remove it from the language core ENTIRELY. If it was a private function used inside the runtime, maybe that would be fine, but it's a public part of the API.

[ufo]

>I have never, ever seen nl2br referred to as making anything secure or safe.

There is also no mention in the manual that it is unsafe! One of the big problems with PHP is how easy it is to write dangerous code and how the standard manuals and tutorials often give little explanation to this.

[Firehed]

It should be better documented to not directly print user input in HTML context, and there should be a very obvious best-practices[1] guide for newbies explaining what to do (and what not to do). But nl2br could only be dangerous is you misunderstand the function's name, description, sample code, and everything else on the documentation.

[1] as if they would read it...

[tolmasky]

> By passing text to something that replaces new lines with br the implication is that it is now safe to drop into HTML

> I don't see how that's implied at all. After all, the function is named nl2br, not html2text.

Absolutely every example from the documentation http://php.net/manual/en/function.nl2br.php uses it exactly in this manner: taking the output and immediately outputting it to the resultant HTML document. I've already described why this is unsafe (take any of these examples, replace the string with something like "Everyone knows 4 < 5", and it breaks the document due to the inclusion of "special" characters).

Now you feel that the correct use of this function is so obvious that it merits mocking my belief that it may be misunderstood by users (despite the comments on that very documentation page describing how they use it as a simple text to html converter). So given that it is so obvious to you, I repeat my original request: just give me an example where nl2br isn't ultimately used to transform plaintext before outputting it to HTML.

[paranoiacblack]

Have you actually read the PHP documentation page for nl2br? People are absolutely using it that way and not making any remark about safety or security. As an anecdote, when I started using PHP, I began to use nl2br to change the newlines in my HTML to <br> tags and output them. You can mark that up to me being a bad developer I guess but I literally got the idea from the PHP manual.

Also, your criticism of map() is kind of childish. It doesn't imply to a new learner that they will draw a map, nor does the documentation even hint at anything like that. In the Python documentation, they are given a clear use case and, if they are familiar with programming (or linguistics), understand that usage of the word map as a verb. Don't be obtuse about PHP's bad documentation.