|
|
|
|
|
by msbarnett
4923 days ago
|
|
> That obviates YAGNI, because it implies no extra cost incurred for doing it right. I'd rather enable It rather than assume I ain't gonna need It, all things being equal. All I can say to this is that we have vastly different approaches to engineering. Features are debt. Adding features you don't need now and will probably never need in service of some kind of ideological purity ("doing it right") is the worst kind of deficit spending. I've done my time in big enterprise vast complex interlocking highly abstracted development. For every 1 time prematurely optimizing for flexibility happened to pay off, it resulted in onerous development and maintenance overhead for no benefit 9 other times. Do the simplest thing that works. If you don't need it now, assume you ain't gonna need it and only build it if and when you have a pressing need for it. To me, these are the very core of sound, reliable engineering. |
|