[alecdibble]

Hopefully the take-away is an explanation would have been helpful when the ToS was changed. Everyone was given limited information and they interpreted it how they could.

Maybe sites will think about this next time they quietly changed their ToS.

[MichaelGG]

If they needed an explanation to say "the terms say this, but we don't really mean it" then perhaps they should just not release a ToS with stuff they don't actually mean.

It's little comfort for a company to say "oh the contract says X, but don't worry it's not true".

The take-away here is to actually properly review the ToS in light of "how might a user interpret this" not in "how can we make sure we have the absolute most coverage on our side".