| I'm still not sure where the arson/gun violence comparison is viable. Steps have been taken to try and curtail deaths caused by fire (deliberate or otherwise) which have clearly succeeded. Are they foolproof? Not at all. But aside from more inspections to prevent code violations, what additional steps are there? Preventing doors from being locked? Providing better battering devices for police? Banning fire? The way I see it, the pro-gun lobby and enthusiasts have so successfully barred the door to future attempts at legislation that most consider it a topic un-worthy of discussion. And, again, I say all of this not even really believing that more gun legislation is the answer. These are the better options: - Better, easier to access healthcare (including mental health resources -- this is something that most western countries should improve) - Close the income discrepancy between the wealthy and poor which will open up advancement opportunities for lower income families and individuals - Decriminalize certain drugs, or at least possession - De-emphasize incarceration over re-habilitation in the prison system (for profit prisons? Jesus...) Address the perceived necessity for weapons rather than the weapons themselves. |
But how can you ever do that?
No matter how much the above prescriptions change the facts on the ground, there will still be criminals and mentally ill people who attack others. And you'll never change what's historically the biggest killer of all, the threat of governments, most especially including your own as the last century's history wrote in blood.
So I don't think you'll ever change my perception that I need weapons.
(I also "need" "weapons" to target shoot, but that gets a little complicated.)