|
|
|
|
|
by jacquesm
6319 days ago
|
|
Why ? Flashback to '78 when the term was coined maybe, but since roughly 2004 there has been an enormous acceleration in the amount of funds that are poured into this field. Right now a large number of companies is actively building solutions to deal with enormous amounts of genetic data, pattern matching (see the various iterations of 'blast'), very rapid sequencing (a complete human genome now in about 14 days, possibly already faster). Nanotech is still in its infancy in comparision, and major breakthroughs in nano machinery seem to be forever about 10 years in to the future (a bit like real A.I.). |
|
Really? Because I left the field in 2004 partially because funding was drying up.
Some of the big ideas in bioinformatics are interesting but most of the grunt work is not very interesting or fun. And, the "bioinformaticist" on the team is the one responsible for the grunt work. The actual work is mostly 1990s style java, perl and visual basic programming.
Maybe things have significantly changed over the past five years but I doubt it since I've hired a number of refugees from various biopharm firms.