|
|
|
|
|
|
by gnu8
4939 days ago
|
|
|
Most members of this community see the absurdity of making a certain string of bits illegal, whether its the private key to decrypt blu-ray discs or describes the shape of a firearm. What's odd is that they don't see the parallel absurdity of outlawing a piece of metal carved into the shape of a firearm. Perhaps they will now that its possible to produce the object from the bits. |
|
|
What parallel absurdity?
A number's meaning is entirely arbitrary and dependent on the context: a bit-string that is a pattern for a firearm in program A might be a perfectly valid music file in program B.
Firearm is a piece of metal that had to be precision shaped to throw small pellets of metal at very high speeds.
(I'll agree that 3D printing muddies the waters though.)