[LnxPrgr3]

I searched HN for this story and was surprised to not find it, so I submitted it myself. It was dead within an hour.

And really, thinking about it now, it probably deserved to die, just as the Apple story probably deserved to die. The only real lesson from these stories is that you can't blindly follow your GPS… and everyone should've already known that. But all that did get hashed out in the Apple thread and really doesn't need a rehash so soon after the first story.

So… is the missing story the result of pro-Google/anti-Apple bias? It certainly could be, but I can't say that's the only plausible explanation.

[sbuk]

I enjoy hiking as a hobby and while I plan route with the use of a computer, I'd personally neverer rely soley on electronics when I'm out. The only reason that I suggest that bias is there is that the Apple story garnered quite a lot of attention, with much of the criticism extolling the virtues of Google maps. This was a timely reminder that they are not the panacea of mapping either. I wouldn't ever use Google Maps to plan a hike, they simply aren't reliable enough. So I take and accept your point, but will reserve a healthy amount of scepticism.

Edit: A case in point is the sub thread on search in the AppStore vs Google Play. I use Google Nexus and iOS devices and can assure you that the Play store on the phone is worse that the AppStore. The online version is significantly better. Discoverability is awful in both. This maybe my opinion, but it's based in real world use of both.