|
|
|
|
|
|
by emehex
2 hours ago
|
|
|
> real, production-grade UI framework What does this even mean? There are hundreds of thousands of apps in the App Store that are 100% SwiftUI. They are real. And they are very much "production grade". The only people still complaining about SwiftUI 7 years later are the UIKit holdouts that never took the time to properly learn how to use it. |
|
|
The first is a statement of quantity, the second is a statement of quality, dubiously supprted by the first.
The Mac Settings app still lags between panes years after it was redesigned to look like iOS. I would think that if they had a viable way build a high quality and performant app with even relatively basic UI components (if they cared to do so) they'd do it for the 1 app that's deployed to every mac.
SwiftUI does work in certain circumstances, and does work for allowing people to shit out their ideas faster, but it has struggled with the aspects described in the video. Some companies don't care either, and turnaround time is paramount, but in this discussion it's about quality compared to what came before.