|
|
|
|
|
|
by chongli
1 hour ago
|
|
|
It’s a rant, but not about technology. It’s a rant about her chosen genre being maligned unfairly. I think a more interesting tack on this argument would be to say that hard sci-fi tends to be more pro-technology and soft sci-fi tends to be more technology-critical. But some soft sci-fi is genuinely technology-neutral, using futuristic settings for aesthetic reasons only, not for any kind of investigation or argument either way. |
|
|