Is there any indication that it was a mini/fast/older model, or on a low effort level? My read of the reactions above is "ugh AI", not "ugh AI on the cheap". Not a single poster mentioned model or effort choice. It seems more like the usual irritation at "AI slop".
If you just mean that the result was technically incorrect or off, that's probably true, but it doesn't affect my argument.
If you just mean that the result was technically incorrect or off, that's probably true, but it doesn't affect my argument.