Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by scrapcode 4 hours ago
I never personally liked the blanket advice to "Max your 401k." For most, if achievable at all, that would be the most they can invest at all. Even though it is often recommended alongside a proper "emergency fund," that advice leaves little liquidity without major penalties.
3 comments

> I never personally liked the blanket advice to "Max your 401k."

I think the general advice is max out employer contributions to your 401(k)

* https://old.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/wiki/commontopics

* https://old.reddit.com/r/PersonalFinanceCanada/wiki/money-st...

For enough income, maxing out 401K is the one way to reduce taxes and keep your money.
Roth contributions are withdrawable without penalty. Also most employers offer a match of some amount, which is essentially free money.
Not Roth 401ks, only IRAs
Yes, although some plans let you roll contributions into an IRA.
Most people here are probably paid too much to contribute to a Roth IRA.
I have considerable Roth assets because my employer's 401k allows for the Mega-backdoor, which means I can put $30k+ per year of after-tax income into 401k (beyond the normal pre-tax contributions) perform a Roth-in-plan-conversion on the after-tax assets, and then roll it out into a Roth IRA.
That's what the https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/backdoor-roth-ira.asp is for, assuming you don't have any existing traditional IRA balances
You can also roll your traditional IRA into an employers 401k (if the plan allows this) to zero out your traditional IRA balance.
You can convert your 401k to an IRA when you leave an employer. Some employers also offer in service rollovers (I think these mostly have minimum age restrictions on them though)
That’s a traditional IRA, not Roth.
The five-year clock is for the original contribution. It’s important not to get that mixed up.
I believe the general idea is to max it if you can. If you can't, put whatever you can, and forego luxuries like vacations until you can.