[Dylan16807]

> It makes zero sense. Refresh is disturbance in itself. You are entering a recursion here where the mere act of refreshing increases the counter values of victim rows making refresh even more frequent. At the end you have DRAM that you cannot read from or write to at all because it’s always refreshes itself.

That's not how infinite sequences work.

If each refresh causes 1/n more refreshes, then your total time spend on extras is is 1/(n-1) of your original number.

So even if you had an extreme 5:1 ratio, 100 accesses would cause 20 additional accesses which would cause 4 additional accesses which would cause 1 additional access. It would be fine.