Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by IheartApplesDix 4935 days ago
Deabstraction of money doesn't really make your argument any clearer as it has no bearing on the law of supply in demand except to make clear that it's arbitrary and can be changed at any time.

Gas is a commodity so the price wouldn't fluctuate like that. At least not for a long time and not for economic reasons other than greed. Of course, greed is a natural market force, but it's not like that there would be a gas shortage from everyone being able to afford to fill their 20 gallon tanks.

2 comments

Deabstraction does help: compelling the employer to pay a gas station clerk 30 gallons of gas per hour would screw up the economy. That work isn't worth the value of that much gas.

Mundane labor, that which pretty much anyone can do with minutes of training, is also a commodity. And you haven't lived thru the shortages from everyone wanting to fill their 20 gallon tanks at once.

Who covers the difference between the $7/h gas station attendants currently make, and the new $100/h? How do they do this without raising prices? Where does the farmer buy gas so as not to have to raise the price of food to match?
I was working under the assumption that the government would subsidize the difference.
Correction: government would confiscate the difference from other hard working people and encourage low-end workers to stay in those low-value jobs. Really screws up the labor market: "why work harder? I'm getting $100/hr running a cash register!"