Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by willy_k 1 day ago
That’s very anthropomorphized language. It’s still a program operating under the constraints of the programmer. So agreed, don’t blame the AI, but it’s not clear at all that it’s even possible to “blame” an AI.
1 comments

> That’s very anthropomorphized language.

Yes, and it's deliberate.

> It’s still a program operating under the constraints of the programmer.

And we're all just neurons firing in exquisite patterns inside a biological computer.

Unlike the AIs, we've never met our own programmers, and yet we've caused more damage in their name than all the AIs combined have caused in ours.

LLMs are not conscious.
Who's to say you are conscious?

Only consciousness I'm sure of is my own. Everyone else, it's a leap of faith. I have no trouble extending that leap to cover AIs.

Thats some silly intellectualism, people are conscious and machines aren’t. We don’t need precise definitions or scientific rigor to know things.
> people are conscious

Prove it.

> machines aren’t

Prove it.

> We don’t need precise definitions or scientific rigor to know things.

You "know" because of empathy. You're a human, you're conscious, therefore other humans are probably conscious too. The truth is for all you know they could be soulless golems, you just choose to believe otherwise. It's a spiritual belief.

> It's a spiritual belief.

Yes. Thats part of human reality. Denying it is counterproductive at best.

"What's it like to be a bat"
Please define consciousness