|
|
|
|
|
by fn-mote
2 days ago
|
|
> Very few problems really have "all the tooling to verify its hypotheses" This is such a blanket dismissal that I can’t agree or disagree. Maybe very few of YOUR problems are this way. At least mention some problem domains. Recent experiences: compiler-related (helpful), UI-related (agree it isn’t testable but the design iteration is quick, easy, and correct), debugging technical configuration problems (useless; I basically have to solve each problem myself before the LLM recognizes it). |
|
> Maybe very few of YOUR problems are this way. At least mention some problem domains.
i did in second part of my comment. why do you think billions are being poured into ai if ai can already do verifable tasks.