Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by infecto 1 day ago
That’s truly the playbook when you are on the other side of a levered firm though.
1 comments

Yeah, probably. Its too bad.
If there's any purpose in hedge funds as a structure it's that they provide liquidity for the market. So it's in everyone's best interest to let them do price discovery against each other.
It's not just liquidity. Price discovery helps everyone. The earlier the correct price is discovered, the less we're all screwed when the bubble pops. I think they're rewarded too well for the function they serve but whaddya gonna do.
I mean, most of them underperform S&P, at least after fees.
I think on average they match a typical 60/40 portfolio on a risk adjusted basis. The goal is less to out perform long term and more to avoid big downturns (hence "hedge").

I do think there are some firms that have the skill to out-perform long term, but then the average is dragged down by ones like the subject of this article.

Rentech surely exists but you can't become their LP, which allows the median hedge fund to exist, yes.

As for the strategy, that's the idea but all of them market themselves on the returns first and foremost.

Why too bad? This is how the market ultimately comes to the right price.
Not really.

Using leverage has risks that you're supposed to understand before you do it.

It's not a free lunch, unless you're putting the sharks' interest ahead of yours. Or clueless, which was the case here, as L.A. is not a trader and has no business running a fund.

Too bad for the people that were overleveraged? I don’t see why, they assumed too much risk and lost. This isn’t a WSB guy blowing up, it’s a collection of capital from sophisticated investors that understand the risks.