Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by TeMPOraL 1 day ago
Weird analogy. Nonsensical from both physical standpoint (the only energy input when swinging is the person on the swing "pumping their legs"), and practical one (you usually sit down with the swing already at an angle and then kick off, so a good 50% of the arc/momentum is there from the setup).
3 comments

Right, and remember how getting the rhythm right was the whole trick of it? Learning when to bend back and when to lean forward? When to pump your legs, so that your relatively small inputs were additive to the momentum of the swing, not fighting it? How when you kicked at the wrong time, you could feel the balance upset, you could feel the swing slow?
It's not bad I think. We must be open-minded and humble, like a child, and learn how the system actually works in order to be effective.

Often times our first instincts will not work, so we must observe, experiment, and try again. And not be afraid of looking foolish with our legs flailing around. Find the underlying rhythm and flow with it, not against it.

You clearly didn't read this. It's about rowing. Not being on a playground.
The original quote is a bit unclear, but it does refer to being on a playground:

"Recall the pure joy of riding on a backyard swing: an easy cycle of motion, the momentum coming from the swing itself. The swing carries us; we do not force it. We pump our legs to drive our arc higher, but gravity does most of the work. We are not so much swinging as being swung."

It's a bit confusing since it starts with "Rowers have a word for this frictionless state..."

I spent a good minute or two trying to picture what 'drive our arc higher' could mean during rowing, as that is not when force is exerted...

I found it excerpted in Getting Things Done, where the author presented it as the ideal for how one should approach their life, both professionally and personally.