|
|
|
|
|
by GuB-42
1 day ago
|
|
But is there a not-simple metric? The advantage of "publish or perish" is that it is based on something concrete. The system is gamed, for sure, and even more so with AI, but still, a paper which is cited a lot tend to be useful and the authors get rewarded. Remove that metric, and for the lack of a better idea, it will just turn into a game of who has the best connections or who talks the most convincingly, I mean, even more than it is now. |
|
Instead of wasting some resources on corruption and bad judgement, we now waste them by forcing people to chase the wrong goal. In other words: "If you rely on incentives, you undermine values." (Barry Schwartz)
So I don't disagree with you, but I think we went too far into that direction. We have allow people to use their better judgement sometimes.