|
|
|
|
|
|
by IanCal
2 days ago
|
|
|
I think you’re right, my base assumption is that the models can code and can fix bugs, and can code more in parallel and faster than humans at a lower cost. If Google are tackling lower value bugs with AI the number is in a way inflated compared to some utility measure (fixing a smaller number of worse bugs could be preferable) but it’s still things fixed. |
|
|