[DarkNova6]

From what I gathered the core problem is flattenability. It is backed by a dynamic array and you would need real templating to remove the indirection.

[joe_mwangi]

They are researching to have immutable arrays. Also multifields (stack allocated arrays as fields in value classes). So, there is a possibility.

[J-Kuhn]

The problem is not that the array is mutable, but that the size of the array may differ for different strings. (In fact, it usually* does differ if the string length is different).

This makes it impossible to flatten - as the VM needs to know the total size when creating the memory layout for a class...

* (with a small exception: if the strings use different coders, one can be twice as long and the backing arrays would still have the same size)

[DarkNova6]

Indeed. At this point you’d need to bring the size of the string into the type system (C++ Templates we meet again!) but then you look at a solution worse than the problem…