|
|
|
|
|
by oersted
1 day ago
|
|
Check their R&D expenditures and profit margins they are quite poor. Their revenue has always been sustained by the fact that their technology needs to be constantly replaced because it keeps getting better. The moment it stops getting better, the replacement rates plummet and so do their revenues. It's also really not that hard to compete with them when they get complacent. I'm not counting Nvidia because they don't produce semiconductors themselves, they are a different kind of business. They are indeed an example of those that cater to consumers and/or build popular products based on foundational tech from others, like Apple or Sony, which do tend to be quite profitable. But the actual deep-tech semiconductor firms? They may be critical to the world economy, but they don't actually make that much money comparatively. In many cases they are not real monopolies, it's just that no one else wanted to continue investing in a shitty business model. Only the likes of TSMC and Samsung were okay in playing the low-margin game, but most US players left the board. I believe AI has a lot of the same characteristics. |
|