Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by simianwords 1 day ago
if they took their time then billions of people wouldn't have access to it for years and decades.

its now super clear that AI is a step improvement in coding, mathematics and other domains. the push for AI has worked out in hindsight.

there will always be people who will parrot the METR study and claim productivity didn't increase but its best to ignore them.

1 comments

I don’t see the problem with the technology not being available widely for way longer as it improves. If you think the current situation is a good one you’re not paying attention to how ridiculous the spending has been on the AI bet. What exists now is not sustainable at all, and is already the cause of a massive worldwide inflation. And so far no proof of improving companies ROI.

The AI push is going to damage our societies for a long time

Why do you think the spending is ridiculous? Do you not agree that we've had a step improvement in coding, mathematics, search/retrieval?
It's irrelevant... The spending commitment OpenAI has for 2030 is larger than the projected AI infra market in 2030. And we still haven't seen a proof that agents contribute positively to consumers ROI. It's a capital misallocation problem, a number problem, that has nothing to do with subjective feelings regarding LLMs
In that case, if the numbers do work out and labs make shit load of money, would you agree you were mistaken?
no... please actually look at the information we know about AI vendors and how much debt they have. OpenAI is projected to have more than $20B in losses for 2026. They wouldn't _just_ need to make a shit ton of money, they would need to first become profitable, then do a shit ton of money while staying profitable, for multiple years, just to match their spending commitment. That's not even taking in account their ROC and company valuation
Sure but if they do make money and profit, your concern would have been invalid in hindsight wouldn’t it?

Your concern seems to be profitability of OpenAI but that’s easily falsifiable. I’m not saying it’s 100% but I’m saying if they do turn out profitable, your concern wouldn’t have been valid.