[rglover]

Author, here. Thanks for sharing this!

[placebo]

Reader here. Thanks for creating this. Totally resonates with my own thoughts, so if I'm wrong at least I have company :-)

I do have a suggestion for those who object to this line of reasoning: Follow the 5 why's to try and get to the source of your own reasoning and see whether it still makes more sense - in the sense of whether you end up adding to the common good

[Zacharias030]

Ironic that parts of the article feel so AI written.

load-bearing this load-bearing that

[placebo]

They don't seem that way to me. I should also note that AI generated content can at times be better than some human generated content

[jeremyjh]

It’s been well thought out and edited but it’s clearly written by AI, and it was obvious long before “load-bearing”. Still - it makes an important point well and is worth reading.

[Zacharias030]

Agree exactly!

If every use of AI was like this, I perhaps wouldn't have this slight allergic reaction to it, but as it stands, this voice and rhythm has become associated with bad lazy grifting writing.

[Towaway69]

> But those questions feel slow because they remove the little dopamine hit people get from motion.

An AI won't have written that - that would imply that AIs would be criticising their overlords and masters.

[MobiusHorizons]

Thanks for writing it! It was exactly what I needed to process my frustration with work today.