|
|
|
|
|
|
by protocolture
2 days ago
|
|
|
Their biggest fault was giving back the filing cabinet. >where they edited footage to make it look like a soldier was shooting at an innocent civilian. In your link the ABC is claiming the footage wasnt edited by them. I mean its still a bit of weak journalism to publish it. Did that ever get resolved either way? |
|
|
I'll admit I don't fully understand what they were claiming/how it changed over time but they later issued an apology for the incident [1].
From what I can work out the thrust of the abc claim is "don't blame our journalists, the editors on multiple occasions accidentally did this for no reason at all and we then failed to catch it".
Then midway through the apology they pivot to blaming twitter, or at least that is the flow of the guardian article.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/sep/17/abc-australion...