|
|
|
|
|
by keiferski
4 hours ago
|
|
This is one of those topics that annoys me, because the reporting on it is always “how dare they!” and never a realpolitik explanation of how states attempt to interfere with each other’s power-selection mechanisms. It seems pretty obvious that every great power attempts to influence other states. The more interesting question is: when is this acceptable? To what degree? Is a leader commenting on an election fine, but actually committing funds toward NGOs too much? Is it completely acceptable for certain political ideologies but not for others, i.e., it’s okay for me to interfere with you, but not for you to interfere with me. Is it acceptable against adversaries but not amongst allies? (This last one is probably the real question RE: the US and EU.) It’s a complex geopolitical question. And no matter which answer you give, there will be examples that make you uncomfortable and willing to break your own rule. |
|