|
|
|
|
|
by monk_grilla
3 days ago
|
|
There is no reason to distinguish LLMs from other forms of software, though. If calling them intelligent makes you uncomfortable, perhaps you can concede that they can solve problems which previous machines relied on external intelligence for? I think this is irrefutably true, and is the practical question that matters. > None of the progress in LLMs or ANNs gets us any closer to making a robot as smart as a cockroach. Can you explain this a bit more? As far as I can see, the only barrier to making an artificial cockroach of superior intelligence even at the current state of LLM technology is a mechatronics and miniaturisation problem. I think you would be hard pressed to design a problem that a cockroach can solve but Claude cannot. |
|