Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by post_break 3 days ago
Assuming running a dual hose inverter portable AC isn't against the lease agreement it would probably pay for itself based on the power usage. Pretty neat hack regardless.
2 comments

Why? A dual-hose portable is more efficient than a single-hose, but a PTAC should (in theory) be more efficient (and possibly quieter) on account of having the heat-emitting side of the cooling loop outside of the living space, which is closer to the ideal split system - though I suppose that advantage could be undermined by the unit's age and condition.
Single-hose is always awful. It can't be other-than-awful.

All of the air that gets pushed out of that singular exhaust hose gets replaced by hot (and often very humid) outside air -- the same stuff we're burning electricity to fight a war against. (It is my considered opinion that single-hose portable aircons should not exist, and I'd remove them from the Earth if I had the ability.)

Dual-hose units can work OK.

They have some advantages, too, like being portable (they can be placed in the space that most-needs cooling instead of the space where they're mounted hard into a wall), or being quiet[er].

I've never experienced a PTAC in an NYC apartment, but some of the ones I've used in hotel rooms have been monstrously-noisy. I would never want to live with one of the noisy ones.

Well considering those units have an EER rating of 10-11, my comment stands. The midea duo has a SEER of 14.7. 1200 watts vs 816 watts.
Portable ACs are generally less efficient than regular window ACs and PTAC units since the compressor is inside the room.
Yes, except for dual hose inverter ones.
There are also portable split systems like Midea Portasplit.