|
|
|
|
|
by cookiengineer
2 hours ago
|
|
The cheaper the relay mechanism is, the more noise/spam you'll get. Lots of servers online have a publicly exposed smtp port, where all kinds of script kiddies are just using a sendmail style email from another (not-owned) domain. DKIM/DMARC tried to fix this (without success due to fakeable entries in the DNS records, spf=all is pretty much everywhere anyways nowadays). So my proposal for actual ownership of domain AND server infrastructure would be mutual TLS. Reverse IP lookups are broken almost always anyways, due to most hosting providers not offering real reverse DNS infrastructure that users can modify. This way a compromised server can't send as another domain, and large-scale spamming relays that rotate ASNs would have indicators in the cert itself, which they run out of real quick due to limitations of how many IP/DNS subjects you can set in an SSL/TLS cert. No faking and avoiding bad IP reputations by rotating ASNs anymore. |
|