Not only that, but nobody really cares about whether truth vectors can work correctly under carefully constructed paradox edge cases. Well, maybe mathematicians do, but nobody else.
someone on HN about a year ago was trying to argue that an LLM is not a cultural artifact for an anthropologist to study.
There's definitely people around that have no idea about the "soft" sciences and how an LLM while constructed from a "hard" science is almost entirely a "soft" science object.
The latent space encoded in the weights of a model is itself an object of study, just as interesting as the model itself.