|
|
|
|
|
by b112
3 days ago
|
|
How is this a fair and reasonable assessment? From here: https://x.com/HedgieMarkets/status/2081534588485296565 A quote: A federal judge ruled the practice is fair use because eliminating the original means only one copy exists at a time. So no, the reason isn't to keep that information, even from competitors. It's about a legal ruling, which allows them to scan said books without infringing copyright. Judicial decisions and case law have lead to this outcome. Please stop spreading rumours without any validity. |
|
Gotta love that ridiculous case law system :D