[skew-aberration]

That's commendable, but I do think it emphasizes my point. If you have such ethical concerns, why develop powerful technology on behalf of shareholders whose identities and intentions are unknown to you? Activation engineering has obvious malicious uses and I can distinctly remember the sense of dread I felt when 'relaxed and expansive' went viral. I believe the 'good AI' future faces political obstacles, but perhaps you take an accelerationist view that technical solutions will pave the way. Given your politics, I wonder if an interview on a show like a Ralph Nader Radio Hour could help you connect with likeminded people from different backgrounds. Best of luck