|
|
|
|
|
by danielbarla
4934 days ago
|
|
If there's no reason to believe that the exploit is already being used in the wild, then I completely agree. I also think that a good compromise would be to pass on the exploit information to some 3rd party, tasked with releasing full details at a certain date (or simply, the responsible release of the exploit). The focus of pressure would then shift from the researcher to this 3rd party, which would presumably have the means to resist the pressure. |
|