[user102030]

Feels like every other site that AI generates. Hard to tell what the creators believe and what is just probabilistically generated.

[atourgates]

I wouldn't be surprised if AI was used to generate it. But it mostly feels that way becuase it uses Astro. There's no other obvious AI tells.

[user102030]

Yeah, I suppose I was just responding to the Astro aesthetics. Copy seems human-written when taking a deeper look.

[semiquaver]

Nothing about this site screams AI to me. The site does its job well. Not sure what you are complaining about.

[tkel]

Sorry it's painfully obvious it's AI generated.

The copy - "it's not left, it's not right," short punchy sentences.

The spacing in the header - font sizes

The copy in the header - Too much text for a title

"Who We Are" section - has 4 symmetrical boxes, filling out the space with unnecessary detail.

The "cards" in the middle content section - Tons of detail . AI loves to generate these as the meat of a website.

The sections after, it begins to devolve into tangents/rambling , but still with excruciating detail. More small cards each with too much detail.

Lots of meaningless numbers highlighted. "20!" "13!"

"Timeline of documented abuse" - this section has text that is too small and a bullet list way too long. AI loves to use this very small text size. Spacing is weird and not made for/by a human.

It keeps going...

I'm sorry but you all need to level up your game wrt detecting AI.

[extr]

I don't really care if it was made by AI or smeared onto the keyboard by a monkey. It was effective in it's job and communicated clearly.

[danielmeskin]

Making a list of the tells you have will only serve to have them prompted against.

[Supercompressor]

I disagree. To me, it's clear from how comprehensive the site is that they are very invested in the editorial outcomes of what they've published.