|
|
|
|
|
by sva_
22 hours ago
|
|
Chill, it's just a rhetorical phrase. They want to show that this KDA is the result of a series of incremental improvements, and I think they did a pretty good job at that. I often find people get annoyed at mathy stuff because they seem to think that they should be able to read it like a (comparatively low information dense) newspaper article or something similar. Math isn't like that, it usually has high information density and you need to parse every single symbol. And also people make this mistake where they gloss over stuff they don't get because they think they'll just understand things from context. Works great in normal literature - but math ain't like that. If you don't understand something, go back to the definitions. |
|