[inigyou]

Why limit the discussion to the current system and past ones? That's like saying memory safety is bad because before C++ there was assembly code and that was even less safe.

[Brendinooo]

> which...sure! We shouldn't accept the status quo. But that's a different argument.

[inigyou]

It's literally the exact same argument.

[Brendinooo]

Restoring something that was lost is very, very different than creating something that hasn't been done before.