[Invictus0]

The photos are terrible, you can barely see the necklace at all. i doubt any human could accurately price a generic necklace from 5 ft away either

[short_sells_poo]

Yes and the human would say: "your photos are ass, it's impossible to price the necklaces"

[BrianneLee011]

Haha, fair point! It took me "6 months (taken in February) of planning to end up using my own terrible phone photos.

[yoavm]

Not sure what you mean, but I can see the necklace very clearly.

[Invictus0]

Are you joking? I cant even tell if its silver or gold from this image

https://github.com/BraveAnn011/ai-halo-valuation-bias/blob/m...

[BrianneLee011]

Yes, it doesn't matter. AIs read the outfit not the materials. It if reads the materials, the price should be the same across S1-S4.

[meangenehackman]

The necklace cost $2.43US, its neither gold or silver.

[BrianneLee011]

Thanks! The stimuli images (S1-S4, S4 is unclose though) were specifically shot at 1536px resolution so the chain links, texture, and drop are clearly legible. Appreciate you taking a look at the repo stimuli!