|
|
|
|
|
by ethbr1
22 hours ago
|
|
The difference is that phased safety/efficacy trial costs are sunk. If it fails, you've produced near $0 value, aside from some more information (maybe) about how something doesn't work. Because those costs are strictly for the execution of the trial, not for the development work before/during/after it. That's in contrast to your hardware prototyping example, where a failed prototype still usually represents >$0 development value. The appropriate analogy would be if every time a hardware prototype failed testing, it was required by regulation to scrap it, go back to the design stage, and restart from there. |
|