[hack1312]

Did you miss he received the therapy under medical supervision and Netflix’s attorney flat out admitted “the ketamine therapy issue has factored into the termination”.

[ribosometronome]

Did you miss that that's according to the one sided exceprt from a lawsuit an ex-employee filed?

[hack1312]

I notice you’re not calling them a liar.

[ribosometronome]

I've no idea what happened. Treating allegations in a lawsuit as undeniable true or "flat out admissions" is a bad idea, though. Doing that would have you believing that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, after all, he claimed in a lawsuit he is.

[hack1312]

Do you think the fired employee’s lawyer would have included it if they couldn’t prove it?

[watwut]

Yes, that actually happens in real lawsuits. It is not even rare.

[ribosometronome]

Are you under the impression that lawyers have never included things that later turned out to be false or unprovable in their initial filing of a lawsuit? If lawyers are so infallible, why would one have openly admitted to firing someone for a legal medical treatment they received?

I think that, per the parent who you initially replied to's point, that taking a tabloid's clickbait excerpts from one-side of a lawsuit is a terrible way of understanding the truth of a dispute.

[tomnipotent]

Did you miss that a company attorney acknowledged "the ketamine therapy issue has factored into the termination?"

[ribosometronome]

Only according to the lawsuit filed by the fired party.