[reasonableklout]

I thought Dwarkesh's position was pretty thoughtful: https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/dow-anthropic

> Nobody is qualified to steward the development of superintelligence. It is a terrifying, unprecedented thing that our species is doing right now, and the fact that private companies aren’t the ideal institutions to take up this task does not mean the Pentagon or the White House is.

> The only way we can preserve our free society is if we make laws and norms through our political system that it is unacceptable for the government to use AI to enforce mass surveillance and censorship and control. Just as after WW2, the world set the norm that it is unacceptable to use nuclear weapons to wage war.

[Johnny_Bonk]

Thanks for sharing, i agree no one should have absolute control of anything imo, and the mo greater the magnitude of implications the more important it should be stewarded democratically with clear and transparent principles with values adhering to things like human dignity, freedom, human, planetary & animal wellbeing etc etc. ill have to read the article

[joeisnotjane]

But why do you think you have the right to decide for other governments? This thinking brings wars.

You can try to negotiate though, but first you have to start respecting what has been agreed on.